March 4, 2010
Obama Must Ensure that Stimulus Funds Go Where Need is Greatest; Analysis Shows Least Diverse States Get the Most
Part of Obama’s goal with the $787 billion stimulus package, also known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, was to aim federal dollars and stimulate the economy in areas that have been hardest hit by the recession. The Act was intended to preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery to assist those most impacted by the recession.
Unfortunately, as a recent Advancement Project analysis shows, far less of the billions in federal stimulus dollars, when examined on a per capita basis, are being distributed to the states that are the most racially and ethically diverse and have the highest levels of unemployment.
Advancement Project’s analysis, based on new data released on www.recovery.gov-, which is the Web site established to give out information on ARRA funds--shows that more federal dollars are going out on a per capita basis to states that have the least racial and ethnic diversity.
If you look at data from some of the most diverse states, Hawaii, Texas, Arizona, New York, and New Jersey, roughly $600 per state resident was doled out in 2009. But in the least diverse states, like Montana and South Dakota, nearly double that amount, about $1,200 per state resident, was distributed.
In fact, Advancement Project’s analysis of state ARRA fund allocations in 2009 and diversity levels shows a significant inverse relationship between the per capita level of ARRA funds distributed and a state’s diversity. In other words, for every one point increase on the diversity index--a zero-to-100 point scale that is a standard way to measure diversity-- there was a $3 decrease in ARRA spending per state resident.
Similarly, there is a significant inverse relationship between unemployment rates and per capita ARRA funds received. States with higher unemployment rates received less ARRA funding in 2009. For every 1 percent increase in a state’s unemployment rate, there was a decrease in ARRA fund distribution of $28.48 per state resident.
The reasons for the disparities in the distribution off ARRA funds will not be clear without further study. Yet, the data revealed by the federal government is already alarming given the far greater levels of unemployment and poverty in Black and Latino communities.
Consider the U.S. Department of Labor’s most recent unemployment data: Some 8.7 percent of White workers were unemployed in January yet about 16.5 percent of African Americans and 12.6 percent of Latinos were unemployed in January.
Furthermore, a report by United for a Fair Economy, State of the Dream 2010: Drained, shows that Blacks and Latinos are 2.9 and 2.7 times as likely, respectively, to live in poverty than Whites. If the goal of the stimulus bill is to target federal dollars at communities that have suffered the worst impact of the recession, clearly, much still remains to be done.
Despite these revelations, there are steps the Obama administration and the Recovery Board can take, to ensure a more equitable distribution of AARA funds that would help meet the intended goals. The administration and the Board should:
Make targeted investments: Create mechanisms and incentives for the receipt of ARRA funds so the moneys are disbursed where they can clearly accomplish the greatest economic turnaround. Investment should be targeted to communities and individuals that have a history of economic distress and have been most impacted by the recession. The money in such communities would directly boost the economy immediately and help those communities the most due to the increase in jobs.
Collect specific data to ensure equity: Require data collection by race, ethnicity, and gender as a condition of funding to ensure that ARRA dollars are spent equitably. Disaggregated data by race and ethnicity should be maintained showing the race or ethnicity of job and contract recipients, as well as the demographics of the communities impacted by ARRA‐funded projects.
Conduct equity assessments: Perform systematic evaluations of the effect of ARRA spending in order to maximize equity and inclusion and minimize adverse and unintended impacts. These assessments should be conducted quarterly and made public.
Enforce civil rights laws: Investigate these disparities to ensure that states are not discriminating in the use of ARRA funds and, where necessary, pursue enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination in the use of federal funds.
Advancement Project believes that linking the distribution of ARRA funds to measurements of diversity and unemployment levels could help the stimulus package achieve its critical goals and engender greater social and economic equality.
To read more Advancement Project’s stimulus report, click here:
www.advancementproject.org/digital-library/publications/states-with-grea...
Advancement Project is a national civil rights organization that advocates for racial justice.



Comments:
Shawn Smith (not verified) on March 12, 2010 at 5:25 am
we all are waiting for that let see what will happen...
storesonline25 (not verified) on March 16, 2010 at 5:25 am
Excellent post. Some great informations to be absorbed from this post. I like your writing style very much. Keep it up. I keep seeing article like these.
imergent88 (not verified) on March 16, 2010 at 5:25 am
Very nice article! Thanks for sharing the useful post. I think I will definitely get benefit from your content.thanks for sharing this useful information with us.keep blogging.
Wil (not verified) on March 21, 2010 at 5:25 am
They should take some of those IRS auditors and put them in charge of auditing how stimulus monies are spent.
Instead, they spend their time going after citizens - the very people that generate the monies used to fund the stimulus!
alanhaft (not verified) on March 30, 2010 at 5:25 am
I't's good to know that everybody is trying hard, for an equitable distribution of AARA funds.
We'll see what will be up next.......
Evoco (not verified) on April 3, 2010 at 5:25 am
Great post, very useful for a beginner like me"
Compression Socks (not verified) on April 29, 2010 at 5:25 am
They definitely need forensic accountants to find out where the money goes. I didn't get $600 or $1200. Wheres my cut?
resume help (not verified) on May 26, 2010 at 5:25 am
well, it's been so much since Obama became a President.
JerryB (not verified) on July 14, 2010 at 5:25 am
I definitely agree that there should be more funds allocated to diverse areas, but if you look at the example, the funds are going to more rural areas, which may not have access to the same level of resources as large cities. I'm not so sure its as cut-and-dry as "diverse areas vs. homogeneous areas", but more factors must be in play here.
As far as the unemployment goes, we could get a lot of help if all of these American companies would localize their call center staffing, a job which Americans are willing to do and are actually losing out to foreigners. I'm just saying, corporations should be held responsible as well.
Greg Watson (not verified) on July 16, 2010 at 5:25 am
All of this data is posted online and people have even discovered some extra districts and areas of states that legally don't exist! These are the least diverse areas, all going to one person's pocket for sure. I have heard of some
Post new comment